No product, no affiliate links, nothing to sell you.
slicky.click is an independent web analytics field guide and measurement bench. Every analytics product written about here belongs to somebody else, and this site earns nothing whichever one you choose.
slicky.click is not affiliated with Clicky® or its operator, and it is not sponsored by Google, Plausible, Fathom, Matomo, or any other company named in the research library. The similar-sounding domain does not imply a relationship, compatibility, migration partnership, or endorsement of any kind. Product names are used only to identify the products discussed.
What exists today
The site publishes sourced field guides, positive single-product profiles, a grouped glossary, and browser-based utilities. There are no customer accounts, tracking SDK, hosted dashboards, sales plans, trial, waitlist, testimonials, performance benchmarks, or launch date.
The holding phase has one goal: build a useful body of independent work and learn which analytics questions attract durable attention. The publication can remain exactly that.
Why the coverage is positive
Because there is nothing here to position against. This project sells no analytics product, so it has no reason to tell you what is wrong with anyone else’s — and a great deal of reason not to, since product facts go stale within weeks and a stale criticism is just an error with attitude.
So each profile does one thing: describe what a product is genuinely good at, in its own terms, from its own documentation. No scores. No rankings. No “best tool” verdict. No product described in terms of what another product does not do. If two tools both suit you, that is a real and useful answer, and pretending otherwise would only be useful to a vendor.
What independence means here
There are no affiliate links, referral links, paid rankings, lead-sale arrangements, sponsored placements, or vendor-provided scores anywhere on this site. Nobody pays to appear, and no click here pays us. Vendor facts come from the linked vendor documentation and are labeled with an evidence date. A vendor assertion is not rewritten as an independent conclusion, and a claim one vendor makes about a competitor is never repeated here as fact.
Public pages intentionally do not connect the project to unrelated people, clients, or companies. That separation protects the research question: does the work itself earn search visibility, citations, and repeat use?
If a commercial product is explored later
A real product would require a separate product specification, verified functionality, security and privacy review, legal and trademark review, accurate pricing, support ownership, a named operating entity, and a revised public disclosure. Product or SoftwareApplication claims would appear only after users can actually access the described system.
If this project ever became a market participant, these pages would not quietly stay as they are. Anything covering a product that competed with ours would receive a prominent conflict disclosure or be retired outright, and the independence language on this page would be the first thing to change. A future commercial interest will not hide behind wording written while there was nothing to sell.
How to evaluate this work
Read the source ledger. Check the evidence date. Inspect the calculator assumptions. Compare each stated vendor fact against the linked official page. Review the correction log. If the answer remains useful after those checks, the site is doing its job.
